A workflow for your writing
A review workflow for teachers: check one submission, interpret the result carefully and discuss writing evidence with the student.
Your review workflow
Start with one assignment and a clear reason for review. Check that using an external tool fits your school data policy, then review the text alongside the task instructions.
Read the result, examine relevant passages and ask about the writing process. Compare outlines, sources and drafts when available. Document how you reached a decision under your institution rules.
Treat a detection score as one review signal. It cannot independently establish misconduct. Short submissions, edited writing and conventional phrasing need careful human interpretation.
If a student disputes a result, review earlier drafts and their explanation of the text. Keep a record of the evidence you considered and offer the review process required by your institution.
Useful questions include: How did you choose your sources? What changed between drafts? Can you explain this passage in your own words? Give specific writing feedback and a clear next step.
Check school-approved platforms and their official documentation for integration details. This page describes a manual review workflow; do not assume a connection to Canvas, SafeAssign or Turnitin.
Share only the text necessary for the review, following school rules. Read the privacy policy and tool limits before processing student writing. Class management and batch upload are separate capabilities.
Use consistent review criteria, give students a chance to respond and keep automated findings separate from the final academic decision.
A score should be a review signal. Discuss the writing process, examine relevant evidence and follow your institution review procedure before making a decision.
This guide describes manual review of one text. It does not provide class management, bulk assignment upload or a verified LMS connection.
Academic Integrity
Guides
A practical sequence for checking a draft, editing mechanical language and reviewing the revised version without losing your meaning.
Use Cases
Review coursework and application essays for AI-like writing patterns, then check the argument, evidence and your own writing process before submission.
Check research writing chapter by chapter while keeping citations, specialist terminology and the evidence behind your claims in view.
Review ChatGPT-assisted drafts and mixed writing for AI-like features while keeping model attribution and authorship questions separate.
Edit your own essay for clearer, more natural expression while preserving its argument, citations and the details that make it yours.
Review blog posts, product copy and landing pages before publishing with a process that checks writing patterns, facts and editorial value.
Keep your original draft and review the result with care.
You are not logged in, please login